Veterans-For-Change.org

VFC Visitors Counter

005087768
TodayToday2664
YesterdayYesterday3157
This WeekThis Week19061
This MonthThis Month48135
All DaysAll Days5087768
Highest 06-21-2016 : 17814
IP: 3.90.108.129
Logged In Users 0
Guests 391
Registered Users 1857
Registered Today 0

Latest News

VA News

Appeals Modernization: VA’s Progress One Year Since Enactment of the Historic Law

VA Appeals Process Changes

 

Today marks one year since President Donald J. Trump signed into law one of the most significant statutory changes in decades to affect the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Veterans it serves.

The Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (Appeals Modernization Act) was signed Aug. 23, 2017, aimed at transforming a complex, frustrating appeals process into one that is simple, timely and transparent.

“Before reform, Veterans experienced a complicated appeals system that was buried in several layers of law,” said VA Secretary Robert Wilkie. “The Appeals Modernization Act has since allowed VA, with the help of our partners, to design a new process that offers greater choice to Veterans and faster decisions from VA.”

Today, VA is working toward full implementation of the law, scheduled to take effect in February 2019. The new system features three differentiated lanes from which a claimant may choose in seeking review of a VA denial (or partial denial):

  • Higher-level review;
  • Supplemental claim;
  • Appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) –.

Veterans are already benefiting from the new process. In November 2017, VA began the Rapid Appeals Modernization Program (RAMP). RAMP allows Veterans with an eligible, active appeal to choose between two of the three new lanes now. Implementation of BVA’s appeals lane for Veterans who have appealed their RAMP decision by VBA is expected to begin in October 2018.

To date, more than 40,000 Veterans have chosen RAMP, and more than $45 million in retroactive benefits has been paid to Veterans. Additionally, BVA has issued more than 73,000 decisions thus far in fiscal year 2018, a historic high, and is on track to deliver over 81,000 decisions to Veterans by the end of the fiscal year.

For more information about VA’s appeals modernization process, go to www.benefits.va.gov/benefits/appeals.asp.

Source

Effective Date Fiasco – Intent To File Claims Rob $72 Million From Vets

Robbery 004

 

Here is another leftover from Thomas Murphy’s policies over the past couple years – the agency repeatedly failed to assign correct effective dates costing Veterans at least $72 million in benefits.

Despite rumors of accountability, the agency has yet to take action against Murphy and even let him set up shop as district director for the Midwest. Talk is cheap in DC, and Veterans are clearly paying the price to the tune of tens of millions each year.

Compounding matters is the shoddy help Veterans frequently receive from VSOs who recommend Veterans give up their effective dates in favor of winning claims quicker – – again, costing Veterans tens of thousands in back pay in many instances. You see, when the effective date is wrong, it can substantially reduce a Veteran’s backpay. VA created a ‘fix’ that actually reduces benefits payouts due in large part to not training its staff to process claims properly… and then fixing that system with a complex appeals process the agency still has yet to properly roll out.

All this courtesy of Murphy and his cronies.

The penalty for setting up such a system that would screw Veterans out of benefits?

DAV gave Murphy an award as the top federal bureaucrat fighting for Veterans benefits. Apparently, DAV likes to be ironic. And, VA likes to have a two tiered system for accountability. Corrupt senior leaders get put out to pasture to retire. Small time VA employees get the shaft after they request reasonable accommodations.

According to the IG executive summary:

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a national review to determine whether Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) staff assigned correct effective dates on claims for compensation benefits with an intent to file (ITF). The ITF allows claimants the opportunity to provide minimal information related to the benefit sought and gives them up to one year to submit a complete claim. The submission date of an ITF is important because VA may use the date of receipt as an earlier effective date for paying benefits. The OIG found that VBA staff did not always assign correct effective dates for compensation benefits with ITF submissions from March 24, 2015, to September 30, 2017, resulting in $72.5 million in improper payments. Most of the errors occurred during the initial period of ITF implementation, and the OIG found that 43 percent of cases were assigned incorrect effective dates. This was largely due to a lack of standard operating procedures, inadequate procedural guidance for electronic ITF submissions, deficient and delayed training, and a lack of functionality in the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS). VBA has since reduced the number of incorrectly dated claims to 4 percent. The OIG recommended that the Under Secretary for Benefits prioritize the modernization of the ITF system and consider integrating ITF submissions into the VBMS. The OIG also recommended a special review of Veterans’ claims with ITFs submitted during the troubled period.

DAV pushed hard for the ITF system, and many other programs to process benefits claims faster while placing claims development burdens back onto the Veteran.

Capitalizing on the backlog, VA conned VSOs and their members into accepting a quicker processing system using RAMP that removes many of the duty to assist requirements that protected Veterans claims. Instead of VA being forced to develop a claim, VSOs are now required to help. Of course, if errors occur, you cannot appeal a screw up by your favorite VSO.

What a shame.

Source

Researchers strive to make 3D-printed artificial lung to help Vets with respiratory disease

3D Printed

 

VA scientists are working to create a 3D-printed artificial lung that they tout as having the potential to revolutionize the treatment of Veterans affected by lung disease.

One such lung disorder—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—is one of the most prevalent and costliest ailments in the Veteran population.

Dr. Joseph Potkay, a biomedical engineer at the VA Ann Arbor Health Care System in Michigan, is leading the VA-funded research. It calls for making a prototype of the 3D-printed artificial lung. Potkay and his team hope to build what they call the first wearable artificial lung that is compatible with living tissue and is capable of short- and long-term respiratory support.

The lung is seen initially as a temporary measure, a bridge to help patients awaiting a lung transplant or an aid for those whose lungs are healing. Future versions could have longer-term applications, the researchers say.

Potkay says this is the first time high-resolution 3D polymer printing is being used to create microfluidic lungs with three-dimensional blood flow networks.

Microfluidic artificial lungs, a new class of artificial lungs, mimic the structure of the natural lung better than conventional artificial lungs. Tiny blood channels, some thinner than a human hair, are closer in shape and dimension to those in a person, allowing for blood flow similar to that in the human body.

The biocompatible coatings on the lung’s surface are equally important. Anytime blood comes in contact with an artificial surface, an immune response leads to hardening of the blood and clotting. Biocompatible coatings will help curtail that immune reaction.

“We hope that these microfluidic flow paths and biocompatible coatings will be more compatible with living tissue, thereby reducing the body’s immune response and increasing the lifetime of the device,” says Potkay, who is also a researcher at the University of Michigan. “The flexibility in design afforded by 3D printing gives us more freedom and thus the ease to build artificial lungs with a small size and pressure drops that are compatible for operation with the body’s natural pressures.”

3D printing allows for flexibility in blood channel design

For more than a decade, Potkay has been researching the advantages of microfabrication, the recreation of tiny structures, to build artificial lungs that have highly efficient gas exchange and blood paths similar to those in a human lung. Gas exchange is the amount of oxygen or carbon dioxide (CO2) that is transferred into or out of blood in the artificial lung.

“However, microfabrication is mainly a two-dimensional construction technology,” he says. “With a 2D design, you stack many single 2D layers together. That has limited the ease of creating devices that are large enough for human use. You have less freedom in how you design the blood channels. 3D printing these devices may be a solution to these problems. We can be much more precise and efficient with how the blood flow path is laid out in three dimensions.”

Potkay’s team is working with Old World Labs, a company in Hampton, Virginia, that specializes in high-resolution 3D printing. The firm should be able to produce a small-scale functional prototype sometime in the coming months, he says. The prototype will be about a half-inch cube in size, and the 3D-printed human-scale lung should occupy no more than a six-inch cube space, he notes.

Potkay envisions the human 3D device fitting in a backpack or a small butt pack, with potential use of more than a week. After more development, he expects longer-term use will be possible.

He says it’s impossible to gauge how many years away the 3D-printed lung is from implantation, noting that it must first be tested on animals and people. “We’ll see how well it does in terms of lifetime,” he says. “To be implantable, it needs to be able to operate for months without being swapped out.”

Heart-lung machines that contain artificial lungs have long been in use to rehabilitate lung disease patients. But these machines are bulky pieces of equipment in which all components are mounted on a wheeled pole. Some people call these portable or ambulatory lungs, but in Potkay’s view they are not truly portable.

These machines also require pure compressed oxygen stored in heavy cylinders. However, major advances in gas exchange, compatibility with living tissue, and portability are needed for artificial lungs to fully realize their potential. The device must also maintain appropriate blood pressure, decrease injury to blood cells, and minimize clotting and immune response.

Microfluidic artificial lungs use a fraction of the volume of blood of current commercial devices.

Researchers eyeing Veterans with end-stage COPD

In their research, Potkay and his colleagues are focusing on patients with a buildup of CO2 in the blood, an occurrence that applies to many Veterans suffering from end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. End-stage COPD is marked by severe shortness of breath, chronic coughing, lung infections, or respiratory failure. It can lead to sudden cardiac death. Excess CO2 must be removed from the lungs to stop it from reaching unhealthy levels.

COPD affects 5 percent of American adults and 16 percent of the Veteran population. Most people with COPD have emphysema, in which the air sacs of the lung are damaged and enlarged, and chronic bronchitis, a long-lasting cough caused by chronic inflammation of the bronchial tubes. The disease is characterized by an airflow limitation that is often linked to an abnormal response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases, such as those in cigarette smoke.

Exposure to burn pits, sand, diesel exhaust, and chemicals are some of the most commonly cited factors that lead to lung problems for active-duty military. About 20 percent of patients with severe traumatic brain injury also have acute lung injury.

In 2011, Potkay unveiled a prototype of a 2D-printed artificial lung that used traditional microfabrication techniques. It was a collaborative effort between Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland and the Advanced Platform Technology Center at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center. Potkay was affiliated with that VA facility at the time.

The prototype was unique in how it copied nature. Because of its intricate silicon tubing and ultra-thin gas diffusion membrane, the device was efficient enough to use air as the ventilating gas—as opposed to pure oxygen stored in a tank. It thus created new possibilities for portability and possibly implantation.

The 3D-printed lung will provide the same basic advantages, Potkay says.

“But with the freedom afforded by being able to design the device in three dimensions instead of two, 3D printing should result in artificial lungs with a smaller overall footprint and with increased efficiency,” he says. “Thus, portability and performance will potentially improve using 3D printing.”

3D artificial lung likely to be tested in sheep

The 2D project is ongoing in Potkay’s lab at VA Ann Arbor. He’s currently testing the device in rabbits and is pursuing the next stage of funding to scale the 2D lung up to sizes that apply to human use.

Why continue with the 2D project if the 3D lung appears to be more adaptable to the goal of creating a microfluidic artificial lung?

“Although the 3D artificial lung is more promising, it is earlier in development and still not guaranteed to work,” Potkay says. “We’re further along in developing the 2D device, and we have plans to work around the challenges with that device.”

Lab testing of the 2D artificial lung has provided a glimpse of what Potkay and his colleagues are capable of achieving in a 3D format.

In tests with animal blood using traditional microfabrication techniques, the small-scale artificial lungs achieved the highest gas efficiency exchange of any artificial lung to date, according to Potkay. He expects the “excellent performance” to translate to the 3D lung.

In addition, he says, the initial expected lifetime of the 2D lung of more than a week—identical to the 3D lung—“significantly improved” because of the biocompatible surface coatings that mimic the cell wall. He expects those findings to also apply to the 3D device.

In terms of lifetime, “We believe the 3D-printed device should be better than the 2D version, but we don’t have proof yet,” he says.

When the study ends next year, Potkay and his colleagues hope to test a prototype of their high-resolution 3D-printed artificial lung in a large animal model, most likely sheep.

In addition to COPD, Potkay says the 3D lung could be used as a temporary measure for people with lung diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. That condition is a leakage of fluid into the lungs that makes breathing difficult or impossible.

“It will depend largely on the needs of the patient,” he says. “The removal of CO2 in the blood is the first Veteran application we’re aiming for because it’s the simplest in terms of patient use, the required components, and the size of the device. CO2 removal is a critical need for many Veterans with COPD.”

Source

VA Takes Action to Restrict Collective Bargaining and Official Time

Policies Procedures Handbooks

 

The Department of Veterans Affairs announced last week that it is taking back rights it gave away under the previous administration to preclude collective bargaining on issues indirectly related to VA providers’ professional conduct or competence. Consequently, unions can no longer engage in collective bargaining when it comes to professional conduct and patient care by VA providers.

Former Veterans Affairs chief says it’s ‘astounding’ that outside group is influencing VA policy

Donald Trump 024

Former VA Secretary Anthony Principi says he “found it astounding” that three wealthy friends of President Trump, members of his Mar-a-Lago country club in Palm Beach, Florida, were able to affect executive hiring at the Department of Veterans Affairs and might have influenced VA policy.

Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved.